Aguila

Directed by: Eddie Romero

(1980)

I have never seen anyone who starred on a lot of films until I browsed through Fernando Poe, Jr.'s list of films. His films are not just of pure entertainment but also depict the political, social, and economic conditions of the country which of course, entail a lot of action scenes because FPJ is FPJ. His films would not be complete without those scenes. My mom used to tell me that she and her siblings sometimes watch FPJ when they were still little while shooting the film since it's just near their home. I've never been a fan of oldies movies but hey, this one's a classic (not to mention that it was led by FPJ himself).

The three-and-a-half-hour film is entirely about the life of Daniel Aguila. The movie begins in a scene where the Aguila clan is celebrating the birthday of Daniel Aguila, who happens to be missing for a long time during that event. The story was being reiterated by his wife, Salvacion Llamas de Aguila. One of Daniel's son tried to look for him in Mindanao, hoping that he would be able to find his father. Family ties and relationships was also evident in the film, most especially the relationship of Daniel's son with his aunt, Isabel, and the relationship of Isabel to her stepfather, Simeon. 

Preserving the dignity of one person is necessary to get the trust of the very few. Just like in politics, if one person values his/her dignity, he/she would most probably gain a lot of supporters and gain the trust of the general public. Standing for what you believe is right and moral is a must for every leader. A leader should be not self-centered; he/she should always put others first since that is the reason why they are there in the first place.

Being a good person is not about having wealth or power. It is about making others realize that we are all interrelated and therefore we should all act together towards achieving success. It is about harnessing your own potentials in order to make yourself grow. It is about gaining the respect and trust of others.

RATING:

Movie poster taken from:

http://fpj-daking.blogspot.com//

Good Morning President

Directed by: Jang Jin
(2009)

This Korean film [so far] is my favorite among all the films that we've seen in class. Even though i'm really not a fan of Korean or other Asian films, I was able to appreciate the beauty of this film, not just its audio and visual effects but also the story line and its humor. It is about the life of three presidents in Korea, all of which are undergoing dilemmas which involves making a choice/decision. They all found themselves struggling towards making the right choice: one choice could benefit themselves while the other could change the lives of their constituents. It's a matter of making a choice and not regretting it afterwards. 


The first President in the film is already approaching the end of his term and he won a lottery. Beforehand, he promised that if he wins the lottery, he would donate the money to his fellow Koreans. [Un]fortunately, the president won and had a heart attack; people were not aware of the real reason why he was hospitalized. They all thought that he's a family man, because the first thing that he looked for when he regained his consciousness was his wallet. He cried upon opening his wallet and people, again, thought that he cried upon seeing his family photo, little did they know that he cried because he saw his lottery ticket, which actually hit the jackpot. The jackpot prize should be claimed within the next six months and it is still during the President's term. He visited the presidential chef in the kitchen and had a little chat with him about life. It was really a hard decision for the President but it just proved that he is a man of his own words. He donated the prize that he won to his fellow Koreans even though he somehow regret about it, but it was soon replaced by contentment and satisfaction. 


The second President's dilemma is about being a kidney donor to one Korean student's father, who would die soon if he won't have kidney transplant. At the same time, his administration is facing negotiations with North Korea. Confused and worried, he paid a visit to the presidential chef in the kitchen and spent time talking to him about life. At first, he was hesitant to donate his kidney but he soon realized that he needed to do it to save the life of the student's father. Next thing he knew, after he donated his kidney, another citizen wants him to be a donor, again.


The third President in the film is facing a divorce with her husband during her term. Since she's really busy with her role as the country's president, she didn't have enough time to spare for her husband that is why her husband decided to file a divorce and he said to her during her birthday celebration. It was a tough time for the President and since she was advised by the two former presidents to visit the presidential chef, she did so. Just like what the two former presidents did, she spent time having a conversation with the presidential chef. The chef said that he and his family are happy despite the fact that he rarely goes home. The President had realizations and soon found herself going back to her husband.


The film ended in a bookstore, where a book entitled "Good Morning President" was written by the presidential chef. 


It was really nice that the film was beautifully sewn together despite the different moods in its story line. It was a mixture of comedy and drama, with some twists and turns. I turned out to be emotional while watching the film, even though some scenes were intended to make the audience laugh. I also  had some realizations that being a president is a really tough job since it also overlaps with one's personal life. Making a decision which could either make or break you is one of the hardest realities in life. I might be close to dreaming, but i'm really hoping that our leaders would eventually have a change of heart, thinking about others first before thinking about themselves and their families. In the first place, they are in their positions because they are public servants who [should] aim to serve their country and their fellowmen. Surely, politics makes people rich, but were they able to have a good sleep? Are they bothered by nightmares because of what they do? Do they get real contentment and satisfaction in their lives?


Conscience is one of the best enemies of politicians in every country. It's either they make decisions that would benefit themselves or their constituents. It's either they end up getting too much for their families or making a great impact in the lives of the very few.

RATING:

Trailer from:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=beJ6Wns7LkM

A Special Relationship

Directed by: Richard Loncraine

(2010)

The story of this film revolves around two of the most influential leaders in the world, Bill Clinton, the former President of the United States of America, and Tony Blair, the former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. It focused on the “special” relationship between the two leaders, before, during, and after they took positions. Clinton showed his support to Blair before he got elected as Prime Minister and continued to support and influence Blair as he took hold of his position.

I got quite intrigued with the title of the film at first since “A Special Relationship” didn’t really describe Clinton’s relationship with his wife nor Blair’s relationship with his wife. Instead, it described the relationship of Clinton with Blair and vice versa, since World War II. The film drew several reactions from the class, as if we’re watching a romantic comedy movie where Clinton and Blair acted as lovers. But it was clear; the movie showcased the relationship between the USA and the UK, with their leaders being able to influence each other. Clinton got involved in a scandal and since Blair was known to be a very close friend of him, he was asked by the media about it. Blair gave a “safe” statement to the press and was continued to be liked by many. UK’s Prime Minister gained a lot of supporters, for his intentions were clear, which is for the betterment of the people in UK and its allies. It was his choice if he would get himself influenced by Clinton in decision-making, at first, he always agrees with what Clinton says but eventually, he learned to stand on his own and make his own decisions without the influence of his “special” friend. Both of them learned to manage their relationship throughout their terms since it is not just a political relationship. I believe that all leaders should maintain a harmonious relationship with other leaders but they should take note that they still need to draw a line between a personal relationship and a political relationship since it would greatly affect the decisions that would be made. If leaders are united, it is for sure that it would be easier to assist countries who need help and aid. But the downside of this is that when a war comes out, it would be more likely that countries which have special relationships with other countries would have more allies to help them out during the outbreak of the war which would result to a higher number of casualties.

I have to say that Michael Sheen really looks a lot like Tony Blair and he did a very good job in portraying the role of the prime minister, even his mannerisms were evident in the film. Since it is an HBO film and it was just released recently (last year), it has clear and good audio and visual effects. The film’s setting is dated back from 1992, and the producers of the film did a great job in making everything look like it’s back in the 90s.

RATING:

Source:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWHjHMrRiE4

Spinning Boris

Directed by: Roger Spottiswoode
(2003)

Based on a true story, Spinning Boris is about three American political consultants hired to turn tables for Boris Yeltsin's reelection campaign for the very first democratic election in Russia. Yeltsin's approval ratings were down to single digits and the task of the American consultants is to bring it up. They got confused on who really hired them since everyone that they met told them that they are hired conversation after conversation but they are very sure of one thing: they are hired to help Yeltsin in his reelection campaign. The three went to Russia and were confined to the President Hotel and were only allowed to leave the place as long as they are guarded by the security. Hired by a political elite, they were told not to disclose the identity of the person whom they're working for as well as to keep their own identity. Since Yeltsin would not want himself to personally meet the American consultants, they only get to consult with Tatiana, Yeltsin's daughter. They searched and studied the reasons on what brought down Yeltsin's numbers through various ways such as polls and focus group discussions in order for them to formulate specific courses of actions that would pull the numbers up. One of the things that the consultants did was to provide people who are part of the polling group a machine which determines their reactions and approval/disapproval of the things shown to them. Pictures and clips of Yeltsin while delivering speeches were shown to the group and results showed that people do not like it when Yeltsin is not smiling and when his speeches are long. Because of this, the three decided on coming up with new campaign materials where Yeltsin is smiling and he was told to smile more in front of the crowd. This greatly helped in pulling his approval ratings up so they continued with it. Results also showed that people liked seeing Yeltsin planting trees that's why they made planting trees as a part of his campaign which also helped in increasing his approval rating, climbing into double digits.

The film practically showed how one could actually win an election and how one could gain the support of people by knowing what the constituents want from their politician. The American consultants considered and applied the grassroots level approach since the public are the ones who would cast their votes during the election that is why there is a need to know on what they like on the politician that they want to vote. Politicians should not waste their money on campaign materials which are not appealing to the public, instead they should plan and design their campaign materials based on what the public like. Some people approve of Yeltsin only because they see it as an alternative to the Communists and not because they like Yeltsin. The consultants said that there is a need to "go negative" although Tatiana disapproved of it but afterwards, she saw the need for it and agreed to do it. Yeltsin's approval ratings increased gradually but before the elections it decreased again. But the result of the first ever democratic election in Russia made Yeltsin Russia's first President.

There were a lot of factors and hindrances toward attaining success in Yeltsin's campaign. Since English is not commonly spoken in Russia, the American consultants had a hard time talking, listening, and explaining to the Russians on what they wanted to do. There is always a need for a translator. There was a scene in the film where Tatiana asked them to explain some terms that they used. Another one is a time where they wanted to withdraw the candidacy yet the American consultants never gave up [although they almost gave up]. They did their job and they were successful in doing it. 

Favorite/memorable lines:

"In the U.S., you'd advise a politician with those kinds of numbers to get another occupation."

- Dick Dresner

• Yeltsin's single digit approval ratings did not became a hindrance to the American consultants from doing their job. They believed that these numbers could still possibly go up but if they are in the United States of America, it would be impossible for them to pull the numbers up.

"One of your tasks is to advise us, a month from the election, about whether we should call it off if you determine that we're going to lose."

- Oleg Soskovets

• Determined to win, the American consultants continued playing the game and they were indeed successful in the end. 

"The task was simple education, campaigning 101, stuff like the proper use of polling and the need to test via focus groups just about everything the campaign was doing, or thinking of doing."

- George Gorton

• The success of the campaign of politicians is most likely attributed to what the majority of the public wants.

RATING:

The Distinguished Gentleman

Directed by: Jonathan Lynn
(1992)

Some people would always have the notion that it is easy to get into politics since it is an advantage if you have all the means and charisma to promote and endorse yourself to the constituents. Yet being elected entails a lot of responsibility, some of which [or most] are completely forgotten to be fulfilled by politicians. The Distinguished Gentleman is a film about an aspiring politician who took advantage of the popularity of another [deceased] politician's name in order to win a seat in the Congress. Thomas Jefferson Johnson (Eddie Murphy) is a con man who deceives people through his confidence. He was able to win a seat in the Congress with the use of the popularity of deceased Congressman Jeff Johnson from his own hometown, Florida. In politics, it is necessary to gain supporters and Johnson did this by asking for the help of the senior citizens who are part of an organization. Johnson was able to get 5000+ signatures for his endorsement and he used the deceased congressman's old campaign materials by visiting his widow and asking for it personally. Since the general public are more likely to vote politicians whose names are "popular", Johnson won and became a congressman and he was set to go to Washington D.C. He went to D.C. with his "assistants": his cousin and two other friends. Of course he took advantage of the perks and benefits on being a congressman but day by day, he realized that politics is indeed a dirty game he needed to play. He was challenged by Dick Dodge, the chairman of the Power and Industry committee yet he was able to turn tables for him, proving that he is not just some greedy politician who only cares for his own interest but indeed a concerned politician who wants to make the most out of his power for the benefit of his constituents. He fought for the rights of the children in his hometown who are suffering from cancer because of the electric power company that operates near their school's vicinity. 

More often than not, incumbent politicians take advantage of the "newbies" just like in the film, Dick Dodge, knowing that Johnson is "new" in the world of politics, took advantage of him and made him believe everything that he said. There was this instance where Johnson got involved in an accident with an honest congressman and he turned into Dodge to ask for help and what to do. Dodge fooled him by telling him to bring the congressman into a certain hospital since it is safe from the media. Johnson did what Dodge said but in contrary to what he said, media people were asked to go there and broadcast the incident that happened to the congressman. Of course Johnson did not know what to do since he is just new in this game that's why he asked Dodge for help. It is very disappointing to know that the very people whom you might be able to ask help from would be the very people who will eventually bring you down. Politics is like films. The audience are not aware of what's happening behind the scenes. Politicians are like actors. The audience were captivated and impressed by what they say and do on screen. Getting into politics is just one step, staying is the second one which is the hardest. It is like a life and death situation where you have to choose whether to get yourself influenced by others or not. A life and death situation where you have to choose whether to take advantage of your power and authority to fulfill your responsibility for the benefit of your constituents or for your own good. Jeff Johnson soon realized what his real agenda is, which is to extend help to his people. He might not be knowledgeable of the constitution and what it entails as well as other political stuff but he surely knows how to help his people which is by talking and listening to them first-hand on what their problems are. This is a grassroots approach which needs to be learned by ALL politicians. It is not good to suggest and formulate courses of actions (projects and programs) from the point-of-view of the politician or his administration. There is a need to get it from the perspective of the constituents who will benefit from it. 

Sometimes I find it hard to watch movies about politics since some of it are really serious and dragging yet this one's tweaked and the entire film's comedy. It made the movie lighter to the audience, without making them bored on the conversations done in the film. This film was made during the year I was born yet there's still no difference on the current situation of politics. 

RATING:

Source:

http://www.listal.com/movie/the-distinguished-gentleman-1992/pictures

Pirates of Silicon Valley

Directed by: Martyn Burke
(1999)

Apple Computer vs Microsoft. Steve Jobs vs Bill Gates. This made-for-television film showcased the rivalry between two of the most influential people when it comes to the computer age. It also unveiled the rise and fall of the Apple Computers and how both Jobs and Gates stole ideas from Xerox Palo Alto Research Center (PARC) and Seattle Computer Products, respectively. Steve Jobs and Bill Gates are pioneers in the computer industry which made so much difference in the lives of millions of people across the globe. 

Who would've thought that a typical geek who wasn't even able to finish college, because of his contribution to the world of technology, would become one of the most successful man in history? Steve Jobs died recently (three weeks ago) yet he left a legacy that benefited millions of people and would influence the future generations. In the film Pirates of the Silicon Valley, the beginnings of Jobs' Apple Computer was shown as well as how it collapsed. He co-founded it with Steve Wozniak and started making models in their garage. They were pretty impressive and smart (considering that they are geeks in college), which paved way for them to talk to companies and encourage them to buy their products (as far as I could remember, they even got patent for their invention). They were rejected a few times yet this did not stop them from moving forward, a characteristic that most successful people possess. In the huge world of business [and politics], not all the time you would be favored by people around you but you have to prove them wrong. You have to prove them that you are capable of changing their lives as well as the lives of the majority. Just like in politics, you have to work harmoniously with people around you, for you to be able to get support and assistance. Jobs tend to scare away his workers; he even lets some of them work overnight in the office to finish their task and gets mad at them whenever he catches them on idle. Jobs is a symbol of perfection, he wants everything to be perfect so as to satisfy fully the needs and wants of people. But he has to be reminded that he has to establish good relationships with his workers so that they would be inspired to work hard and for them not to be threatened. There are a lot of turning points in Steve Jobs' life, just like in any other politician's life, such as his discovery and rejection of the fact that he got his on-and-off high school girlfriend pregnant. He denied that he's the father of the child until there was this scene in the film where he visited his ex-girlfriend's house and saw his daughter playing outside. She never had the chance to know the real identity of the man who was outside their house or simply put, she didn't know that he was her father. Jobs invented the Apple Lisa Computer during the same year his daughter was born and it was said that it was named after her. He was fired later on by the CEO of Apple Computer. 

Bill Gates, on the other hand, is considered as one of the richest man in the world but his beginnings were a little bit shaky, just like Steve Jobs. Gates, along with Steve Ballmer, Paul Allen, and Mike Markkula worked their way towards success as they designed an operating system (DOS) for computers. They were intimated by the IBM, which is already a large company during that time and were surprised to see the large headquarters of Apple Computer. I didn't really have an idea that Jobs and Gates knew each other ever since their beginnings until I saw this film. There was one instance wherein Jobs was having his exhibit during a computer fair and when he was approached by Gates, he refused to talk to him. Politicians pretty much play the same game. If they know that a certain person is not worth their time because he/she wouldn't be of great help to them, they would ignore him/her, unlike if a person is influential and powerful, they would have all the time in the world to talk. This is one reason why most politicians arrive at their own desire of satisfying their own needs and wants. They fail at knowing their real constituents because they do not want to spend time talking to the citizens first-hand. They'd rather create programs or projects from their own point-of-view, disregarding the opinion of the beneficiaries which leads to the failure of the program/project to address the real problem in the community.


Steve Jobs and Bill Gates are like public servants; they [should] aim to improve the lives of the people. They are geared towards looking for ways that would contribute to the betterment of the few. But who are benefiting from their inventions? To be honestly speaking, only those who are privileged could afford the new forms of technology invented by both pioneers which leads us to the assumption that only their lives are improved. 

This scene in the film showed Steve Jobs' "unprofessional" attitude towards people in work. His informal attire was also noticeable in the film since he goes to work in khaki shorts and a shirt. But his simplicity continued 'til the end. We have seen him during his Apple product launches wearing jeans and a black sweater. He will always be remembered. Rest in Peace, Mr. Jobs.

RATING:

Screen shot taken from:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/agyl/167163210/in/photostream
http://www.apple.com

Hitler: The Rise of Evil

Directed by: Christian Duguay
(2003)

I have never seen a man who is so charismatic and appealing until we've watched Hitler: The Rise of Evil in class. It basically focuses on how Adolf Hitler, who is just a typical German, rose to power through the use of his own charisma and knowledge. Since the film's quite new (2003), the audio and visual effects of the film are clear and superb. 

In the earlier parts of the movie wherein Hitler's still a child and a teenager, he already shows motivation in making a change. He joined the military and luckily, didn't get extremely harmed and wounded. His own personal vision of "eradicating" the Jews in Germany was his inspiration and motivation in gathering up the Germans. Hitler's aggressiveness is very evident during his speeches and every time he talks to someone. At first, no one wants to listen to him but upon hearing his very charismatic and powerful speeches, people learned to love listening to him. He eventually gained a lot of followers and supporters, including powerful capitalists in Germany, who helped him in his journey in promoting the National Socialist Movement. He was admired by many yet I found him so intimidating. I even had goosebumps every time I heard his speeches. But at the end of the film, I was so sure that what brought this "typical German" into power is his own self [and of course with the help and support of German capitalists]. Hitler could have been one of the greatest leaders of all time but he turned tables since he initiated the Second World War which led to the death of millions of people across the globe. MILLIONS of innocent lives were taken. I have to pinpoint a scene in the film wherein Hitler was given VIP treatment while he was in prison [as a matter of fact, he doesn't seem to be in jail at all]. This is not new in our eyes for many, if not all, politicians were actually given special treatment while they're in jail [which is also evident in Iginuhit ng Tadhana when Marcos was sent to jail yet he refused to be given a special treatment "daw"]. They don't get to experience what other "criminals" are experiencing in jail such as living in untidy and disgusting prison cells, eating less, sleeping in the floor, etc. They are even given TV sets which could entertain them. This is just one side of INEQUALITY which is evident until the present times. Moreover, the film also showcased Hitler's desire to women and children. His own niece is not even an exception to the rule. The Beer Hall in Germany where almost all of Hitler's speeches are delivered is very significant because this is where he was able to gather and gain followers and supporters. This is where he impressed people. And this is where he exposed his hatred for the Jews [by the way, it is not the fault of the Jews if they are born Jews, just saying], which is the main reason of his movement.

"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."

-Edmund Burke

I couldn't agree more with Sir Edmund Burke's statement. If people would just do nothing, evil is more likely to succeed and overcome. People have to do something in order to prevent evil from rising. More often than not, people are scared to compete against evil because they are afraid that they might lose. But what makes evil succeed is the apathy of people and this should not be the case.

RATING:

Sources: 

http://www.cbs.com/specials/rise_of_evil/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wmgamku-TbE&feature=related

Iginuhit ng Tadhana

Directed by: Mar S. Torres, Jose De Villa, Conrado Conde

(1965)

The movie Iginuhit ng Tadhana, which could be translated in the English language as "Destined by Fate", is a political propaganda film of the late Ferdinand Marcos who is known to be one of the most controversial political leaders in our country. He declared Martial Law on September 1972 which lasted for 14 years. The Philippines experienced the worst during his dictatorship, which greatly influenced our current situation. Iginuhit ng Tadhana showcased Marcos' life story, from the day he was born up to his political reign. Marcos grew in a politically affiliated family, became a lawyer, had a seat in the House of Representatives and the Senate, married Imelda Romualdez, and became President of the Republic of the Philippines. 

The movie was made for one clear reason: to promote Marcos in his presidential campaign. Film is one easy way of getting the attention and sympathy of people and Marcos considered this as a way to promote himself as he ran in the presidential bid against President Diosdado Macapagal.


At first I found it hard to adjust to the quality of the film since it is produced way back in the 60s where films are still in black and white but as the movie went along, I became used to it already. The audio was not that clear as well and there are some parts in the movie where I really cannot understand what the characters are saying. Despite the quality of the film, I still had a grasp on the message that the movie wants to convey to its audience. There is no doubt that it really is a political propaganda movie for it only showed the "good" side of Marcos. For an instance, there are many scenes inside a court house where Marcos was defending himself, for he was accused of murdering Julio Nalundasan, Mariano Marcos' (Ferdinand's father) political rival in Ilocos Norte. In these scenes, Marcos' words were truly powerful and captivating and I think that every Filipino who have seen this film during his time would not think that his words are actually deceiving. They would probably believe everything that he said, thus, he had their sympathy. People say that "seeing is believing" and from what we watched, Marcos really did a great job of gaining followers through this movie. This movie showed only one side of Marcos, making people believe that he and his family have nothing to do with the murder of Nalundasan. Marcos was really close to his mom and she continued to be his source of inspiration until he met Imelda Romualdez. I was truly awed by Gloria Romero's beauty in the film. Like what I've said earlier, everything in this movie is in a positive scale and you cannot really find anything that would give the Marcoses a bad reputation. But the Marcoses will always be Marcoses. What they have done in the country and its people left a mark that cannot be removed even after a thousand years and it will remain to be a scar in the Philippine history. The death of Ferdinand Marcos' greatest rival, Benigno "Ninoy" Aquino Jr., triggered the Filipinos to fight for their democracy and it paved way to the strong unity and sense of nationalism among Filipinos. But history is repeating itself, with Marcos' and Aquino's sons elected in office during the present time, Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos, Jr. who is a senator and Benigno "Noynoy" Aquino III who is currently the President of the Republic of the Philippines. I wouldn't be surprised if Senator Bongbong would run for presidency; there was this one scene in the film wherein Bongbong tells his mom Imelda that he wants to venture in politics someday but Imelda tells him not to because politics is "dirty" yet now, Imelda represents the second district of Ilocos Norte in the House of Representatives while Bongbong's in senate. The Filipinos embraced so much lies that even now, some would still want to believe in. Now everyone's suffering the consequences of what happened during the Marcos regime and unfortunately, the succeeding generations will also have to suffer the consequences. The Philippines is left with great debt that not even all of Imelda's jewelries and shoes combined could repay.

RATING:

All The King's Men

Directed by: Robert Rossen
(1949)

I have one word for this film: REALITY. From the beginning up to the end of the movie, everything seemed to be related on what is really happening in our world. Even though this film did not invest more on audio and visual effects compared to Citizen Kane, its story was the cherry on top. It depicted the reality in politics, where corruption and greed are evident since the early times up to the present times. I was surprised to know that as early as those times, they already have problems like these and it has not been resolved throughout the years. This film left a really good impression to me and for the record, I think that I am starting to admire and like old films. What I love the most in this film is the message that it tried to convey to its audience. Just like in Citizen Kane, there may be good intentions at first but it started to change once you already have power and wealth. In the first part of the movie, I like how Stark's intentions were shared to the public but just like any other politicians, once they get elected, they would turn out to be the people that they are not expected to become. Stark took control of the radio and newspaper, thus, he had the authority to manipulate and influence the views of the people. There was this instance where his son got into an accident that led to the death of his girlfriend. The girl's father went to see Stark and told him that the police reports about the accident are not true but since Stark had the authority to do everything that he wants, he still prevailed. Stark may be able to get the sympathy and trust of the people since he created many projects and infrastructures for them, which by the way, are all named after him. He controlled everything and everyone. Until the end of the movie, while he was dying, he still thought of himself and continued to praise himself. People who served him remained to be loyal to him, despite knowing that they are being controlled and influenced by him already.

Favorite lines:

"It is the right of the people that they shall not be deprived of hope."

- Willie Stark

• I have to agree with this since people have the right to live accordingly and to have access to basic needs and services.

"Pain is an evil. It is not evil. It is not evil in itself. Stark is evil."

- Adam Stanton

• It is not true that good comes out from evil. If you really have good intentions to serve the public and to give them what they want and what they need, there is no need for one to serve himself/herself first. In public service, the citizens are always first.

RATING:

Citizen Kane

Directed by: Orson Welles

(1941)

For a 40's film, Citizen Kane is way beyond exceptional. I am not really into old films since I easily get distracted and annoyed of the audio and visual effects because I was born in the early 90's and I got used to watching films with the 21st century technology. But upon watching Citizen Kane, I was surprised to see something that I did not expect to see. The scenes were clearly shot and shown throughout the movie. I would also like to commend the deep focus shots in the movie, where certain scenes showcased shots that were zoomed in clearly. I did not expect to see this kind of visual effect since in the 1940s, this is not evident, but apparently, even though the movie is in black and white, I was able to appreciate its beauty for its showed exemplary scenes that cannot be made by ordinary movie makers. What I do not like though is the fact that people are talking way too fast and I am really having a hard time understanding what the characters are saying. I had to watch it again for the second time to verify whether I was able to understood it correctly since subtitles are not available. But I guess it is just normal for people in those times to talk fast. 

Flashbacks were shown throughout the film, where various persons related to Charles Foster Kane were reiterating the happenings in his life, from the moment he was taken away from his parents until before he died alone, in the search for the meaning of "Rosebud", the last word that he said before he died. I got curious at this as well, which made me really watch the movie from the beginning until the end. Kane lives through the memories of the people telling his story. He has good intentions at first, but it got converted to greed and selfishness as he got popular and as he acquired wealth. He took control of the newspaper and everything written on it were in favor of him which reminds me of politics in the Philippines. Some publications are owned by wealthy and powerful politicians which publishes news that are completely one-sided and of course, in-favor of the politician's cabinet. If only all politicians have the REAL desire to uplift the lives of people in their country, we are not far behind from attaining progress in this country. Most [if not all] politicians are just good at first, which is common among Filipinos, the "Manana" habit or "maya na" habit. Kane had everything a man could ever wish for but as a saying goes, not all things could be bought. "Rosebud" was shown in the last part of the movie where it was written on his sled from his childhood, the only time that he experienced genuine happiness and it symbolized his loss of innocence. This whole "Rosebud" thing left me thinking on what is my own "Rosebud". Up until now, i'm having a hard time thinking since I really had a lot of childhood memories, some of which I have fully forgotten already (sorry, but I think I have a bad memory on recalling things). With all the exceptional audio and visual effects and a well-written story, Citizen Kane, for me, is one of the greatest films of all time.

Favorite scenes and shots:

(Click picture to see the .gif image)

These shots show Kane in two different perspectives, the first one in which he is much smaller than the gigantic windows and the second one in the windows seem to be in normal size. Kane would always be the same man to himself, but to others (audience) he is a completely different person.  

(Click picture to see the .gif image)

These shots show Kane's marriage and his relationship with his wife through time. From being newly-weds to being apart.

This scene really caught my attention for it depicts how Susan Alexander was controlled by Kane. She was always overshadowed by him and she is living the life that he wants her to have [and not what she wants her to have].

This scene was shown near the end of the film, where Kane's reflection was shown in the mirror. It shows how he reflects his life before he dies.

RATING:

Screen shots taken from:

http://movieimages.tripod.com/citizenkane/index.html

http://movieimages.tripod.com/citizenkane/part2.html

Curtains up

We were told to create a blog that would serve as a web diary of our thoughts, comments, and suggestions for the films that we would be watching in our Cinema and Politics (CINEPOL) class for this term. 

I would be posting my thoughts and comments on films in this blog and I will also include some screen shots of scenes that got stuck in my mind. All sources shall be included in the bottom part of my posts. Also, at the end of every posts, I will rate the films (based on my own perception) through a "thumbs up" thumbnail, with five thumbs up as the highest and one thumb up as the lowest.

Feel free to comment and suggest. :)




Thumbs up thumbnail taken from:

http://www.psdgraphics.com/icons/psd-thumbs-up-and-down-icons/